Home Energy conservation ProEnergy Ohio is already preparing its next poll initiative trial

ProEnergy Ohio is already preparing its next poll initiative trial


Even before the result of the murky number 7 vote initiative that would take $ 87 million of taxpayer money from the general budget and send it to an ambiguous “green energy” subsidy program was decided by voters on November 2, the secret supporters behind it are apparently already preparing to start all over again in an upcoming ballot.

But next time around, they plan to ask for even more municipal taxes.

On Wednesday, ProEnergy Ohio LLC filed documents with the city clerk’s office, this time requesting the transfer of $ 107 million to an account controlled by a committee of petitioners, some of which appear to be the same as those behind the initiative. Issue 7 November .2 general election ballot.

Robin Davis, spokesperson for Columbus Mayor Andrew J. Ginther, said the mayor is awaiting a legal review by the city’s attorney’s office regarding the new case before commenting. Ginther is among those leading opposition to No. 7 in TV commercials.

“ProEnergy’s secret political team doesn’t even have the energy to complete the 2021 election, but they are already preparing another expensive package of bad ideas on taxpayers in 2022,” said City Council President Shannon Hardin in a published press release. I hope voters read number 7 and send a strong message on November 2 to end this blatant plan that will force cuts to basic neighborhood services, police and firefighters.

No one returned a message left on a phone number listed at the bottom of the last deposit. The addresses listed refer to what is akin to private courier services in downtown Columbus and a UPS store in a suburban Cleveland mall.

A private courier services company allows customers to set up what is essentially a “fake office” at PNC Plaza downtown, said Charles Spaulding, owner of Spaulding Expoxy Flooring, whose company was one of several. listed at the same address given by ProEnergy Ohio. He said there were no physical offices at the address, just a mail depot.

The committee seeking to control the money in the last petition submittedconsists of seven people, all listing Columbus addresses: Christina L. Gonzaga; Tyrone Spence; Udell Hollins; Dolores A. Williams; Irene Gil Lamas; Jabarisidiki Gregg; and Cyera S. Black.

As with the last petition that resulted in the issue of the vote on Number 7, nowhere on the record is the name of John Alexander Clarke Jr., who is considered a leader of the movement and has been charged this year with forgery. criminal elections and falsification of records. compared to ProEnergy effort.

The latest filing was attested to by Gil Llamas, who chaired the petitions committee for the current No. 7 and was a plaintiff in the lawsuit against the city that led the Ohio Supreme Court to order the measure on the ballot November.

Gil Llamas and Clarke married and jointly filed for bankruptcy when they were involved in a Columbus house foreclosure case in 2007, Franklin County Common Plea Court records show.

They have declined to speak to The Dispatch over the past year, including an attempt made through one of the group’s attorneys.

Neither the current number 7 initiative on the ballot nor the proposed one details exactly how the city’s taxpayer funds would be spent. Initiative number 7 contains language that would allow the group to spend as much money as they deem necessary to administer the programs they offer, such as green energy education, which is lacking in funding. details, the group declined requests for detailed explanations.

The most recent 280-page petition is mostly made up of signatures that must first be certified as registered voters in Columbus by the Franklin County Electoral Board before the measure can move on to a future ballot. The latest petition requests:

  • $ 10 million for an energy conservation and energy efficiency fund to “promote” these things in Columbus.
  • $ 10 million for a clean energy education and training fund.
  • $ 30 million for a clean energy development fund for minority businesses, so that minority businesses can carry out clean energy projects.
  • $ 57 million for a Columbus Clean Energy partnership fund to subsidize the electricity bills of city residents.

City officials said if voters weren’t keenly aware of and approving the number 7’s current initiative in the November ballot, the $ 87 million lost in municipal taxes would amount to about 11% of the total taxes the city will collect this year. for its general fund operations, which pay for basic services such as police and fire protection, garbage collection, and parks and recreation programs.

[email protected]


Source link